The Disappearing Public Interest: How Corporations Captured America’s Watchdogs, Institutions, and Conscience

By William N. Sosis, Esq.

In democratic theory, the “public interest” refers to the collective well-being of society—those needs and values that serve all rather than the few. It is the principle that should animate government action, guide regulatory oversight, and inspire civic institutions. But today, the public interest lies in a state of erosion. No longer the North Star of policymaking, it has been replaced by a sprawling corporate calculus, where lobbying, campaign finance, and public relations masquerade as democracy.

What makes this shift so alarming is not simply that corporations exert political power. That has always been true. What has changed is the extent to which even those institutions originally designed to protect the public—government agencies, watchdog groups, public-interest nonprofits—have been co-opted and hollowed out to serve private wealth.

The Capture of Public Watchdogs

The United States was once home to a robust tradition of reformers and independent institutions that functioned as guardians of the public. Investigative journalists exposed monopolies, public utility commissions regulated corporate abuses, and professional associations upheld ethical standards in medicine, law, and education.

But over time, as lobbying became industrialized and political campaigns grew more expensive, corporations learned that co-optation was cheaper than opposition. Instead of fighting regulation, they bought the regulators. Instead of fearing exposure by journalists, they bought media conglomerates. Instead of facing lawsuits, they funded think tanks to change the law.

This phenomenon, often described as “regulatory capture,” now extends far beyond the agencies that regulate industry. It includes charitable organizations, civil rights groups, and health advocacy groups—entities that once stood proudly in opposition to unchecked corporate power.

Consider Transparency International, an NGO widely seen as a global anti-corruption watchdog. Few people know that its funding includes grants from corporations such as Citigroup, Raytheon, and Bechtel—companies often implicated in the very corruption Transparency International purports to oppose. It is the equivalent of deputizing the fox to guard the henhouse.

Or take the Sierra Club, long a bastion of environmental advocacy. In recent years, the organization accepted millions from the natural gas industry to promote natural gas as a "clean energy solution"—a position that not only undermines climate science but also shields fossil fuel interests from scrutiny.

Even the NAACP and National Urban League, historic leaders in civil rights, have accepted considerable funding from the telecommunications industry. These financial ties made them unlikely but influential allies in the corporate assault on Net Neutrality. When the time came to defend an open internet—a vital platform for marginalized voices—these groups stood silent or actively supported corporate narratives.

The Corrupted Language of Advocacy

The most insidious effect of co-optation is how it distorts the language of morality and justice. Groups once dedicated to public advocacy now use their institutional credibility to push the talking points of their funders.

Health nonprofits are among the most egregious offenders. The American Diabetes Association receives funding from Coca-Cola and Oscar Mayer—purveyors of sugar and processed meats. The American Heart Association accepts donations from the National Cattlemen’s Beef Association, AVA Pork, and even Domino’s Pizza. These are organizations that once warned Americans about dietary risks; now, they promote health education that conveniently excludes mention of their donors' products.

When watchdogs become mouthpieces, the public is misled into believing that scientific consensus or ethical concern supports what is in fact little more than a marketing strategy. This erodes public trust and disables collective action. If even the most respected institutions have been bought, what hope is there for reform?

Neoliberalism and the Sacrifice of the Common Good

Underlying all of this is a governing philosophy known as neoliberalism—a worldview that reduces every social interaction to a market transaction. Originating in the 1970s and championed by economists like Milton Friedman, neoliberalism asserts that human welfare is best served when individuals pursue private interest within free markets, unregulated by the state.

Over time, neoliberalism became more than just an economic doctrine. It became the ideological justification for slashing social spending, deregulating industries, privatizing public assets, and turning every aspect of life into a profit center. Schools became charter schools. Prisons became for-profit prisons. Even water utilities, once considered public goods, were sold off to the highest bidder.

What this means in practice is that public interest is no longer treated as a shared obligation but a commodity to be bought and sold. If you cannot afford clean water, clean air, or healthcare, then you are told the fault lies not with the system but with your own failure to compete effectively in the marketplace.

Neoliberalism has hollowed out not only public institutions but the very notion of citizenship. It teaches people to see themselves as consumers rather than members of a democratic polity. In a world where everything is for sale, even democracy becomes transactional.

Commodification as Extraction

One of neoliberalism’s most enduring legacies is the commoditization of everything: education, privacy, art, care work, even attention. Data collected from your online behavior is packaged, sold, and weaponized against you. Your child’s education becomes a testing metric. Your healthcare becomes a revenue stream.

This model of commodification is not neutral. It is designed to extract wealth from the many and concentrate it in the hands of the few. Every product you buy, every term of service you click, every wage you accept is part of a system whose fundamental logic is upward redistribution.

The result is a world in which working people pay more and receive less. They are overworked, underpaid, surveilled, and manipulated—yet told that their condition reflects “freedom.” This is not freedom. This is feudalism in the digital age, administered by corporate algorithms and enforced through economic dependency.

The Elite Disconnect

Perhaps the most tragic element of this transformation is the increasing detachment of elites from the everyday struggles of the people. Executives earning eight-figure bonuses have no exposure to the lived experience of housing insecurity, food scarcity, or medical bankruptcy. Legislators dependent on corporate donors cannot see the humanity of constituents who live paycheck to paycheck.

When the elites who shape policy, opinion, and culture operate in a reality divorced from the one most people inhabit, it becomes nearly impossible to enact reforms that reflect the true public interest. Instead, we get “solutions” that treat symptoms while ignoring root causes—more job training for jobs that don’t exist, more apps for communities without broadband, more philanthropy from the very billionaires who rigged the system to begin with.

The Reality of Corporate Crime

Meanwhile, corporate crime goes largely unpunished. Financial institutions crash the economy with fraudulent mortgage-backed securities and are rewarded with bailouts. Pharmaceutical companies flood communities with opioids and walk away with record profits. Oil companies pollute land and water, then deduct the fines as business expenses.

For the average person, justice is slow and incomplete. For the average corporation, justice is optional—and almost always negotiated in private. The criminal law is merciless when applied to the poor, but deferential when applied to the powerful.

The costs of this imbalance are borne by working-class families and the public at large. It is they who suffer when their air is unbreathable, their healthcare unaffordable, their jobs unstable, and their wages stagnant. It is they who must navigate a world rigged in favor of capital and cloaked in the rhetoric of meritocracy.

Follow the Money

In every instance of corruption—whether it be a neutered watchdog group, a neutered government agency, or a neutered public service—the through line is money. Money determines who gets heard, who gets hired, who gets protected, and who gets punished.

Following the money is the first step to understanding how the system works. But in today’s landscape of Super PACs, 501(c)(4)s, “charitable” foundations, and dark-money shell corporations, that trail is deliberately obscured. Transparency laws are riddled with loopholes, disclosure requirements are weakened, and enforcement is starved of resources.

Even those who want to challenge this system often don’t know where to begin. They are busy surviving. They are raising families, working multiple jobs, navigating health crises, and battling inflation. They do not have the time, resources, or institutional knowledge to untangle the legal and financial web that shields corporate power from public scrutiny.

And that, perhaps, is the final injustice. That the American people—ingenious, industrious, and generous—are too inundated to fight back. Not because they are apathetic. But because they are exhausted.

Conclusion: Reclaiming the Public Interest

The public interest is not an abstraction. It is clean water and breathable air. It is secure housing and decent wages. It is access to justice and protection from exploitation. It is the idea that the rules of the game should not be rigged in favor of those who already have everything.

To reclaim the public interest is not merely a political project; it is a moral one. It requires confronting not only corrupt officials and corporate actors but also the cultural ideology that says it is naïve to care about the common good.

We must begin again to build institutions rooted in transparency, equity, and justice. We must dismantle the mechanisms of corporate capture and return decision-making to those most affected by its consequences. We must demand that nonprofits, civil rights groups, environmentalists, and health advocates serve the people, not the corporations.

And we must make the public interest visible again—not as a relic of a bygone era but as a living, breathing imperative of a functioning democracy.

Only then can we begin to restore trust in our institutions, our democracy, and ourselves.

References

1. Berman, E. H. (1983). The Influence of the United States on Educational Reform in Africa: The Role of the International Financial Institutions. Comparative Education Review, 27(2), 233–252.

2. Buchanan, J. M. (2000). The Limits of Liberty: Between Anarchy and Leviathan. Liberty Fund. [Classic neoliberal theory]

3. Citizens for Responsibility and Ethics in Washington (CREW). (2021). How dark money helps corporations wield political power. https://www.citizensforethics.org/reports-investigations/crew-investigat...

4. Coca-Cola Company. (2015). Coca-Cola’s Relationship with Health Experts and Organizations. New York Times investigation. https://www.nytimes.com/2015/08/10/us/coca-cola-funding-obesity-research.html

5. Edwards, M. (2008). Just Another Emperor? The Myths and Realities of Philanthrocapitalism. Demos. https://demos.org/research/just-another-emperor/

6. Greenfield, R. (2014). Why the Sierra Club Took $26 Million from the Natural Gas Industry—and Why They Stopped. The Atlantic. https://www.theatlantic.com/politics/archive/2012/02/why-the-sierra-club...

7. Harvey, D. (2005). A Brief History of Neoliberalism. Oxford University Press.

8. Lofgren, M. (2016). The Deep State: The Fall of the Constitution and the Rise of a Shadow Government. Viking.

9. Mayer, J. (2016). Dark Money: The Hidden History of the Billionaires Behind the Rise of the Radical Right. Doubleday.

10. McGoey, L. (2015). No Such Thing as a Free Gift: The Gates Foundation and the Price of Philanthropy. Verso.

11. NAACP Financial Reports. (2017–2021). Annual Reports and Corporate Donors. https://naacp.org

12. Nestle, M. (2002). Food Politics: How the Food Industry Influences Nutrition and Health. University of California Press.

13. OpenSecrets.org. (2023). Telecommunications Industry Profile: Political Contributions. Center for Responsive Politics. https://www.opensecrets.org/industries/totals.php?ind=B09

14. Pew Research Center. (2023). Public Trust in Government Remains Low. https://www.pewresearch.org/politics/2023/06/06/public-trust-in-governme...

15. Rodell, F. (1939). Woe Unto You, Lawyers!. Modern Age Books. [Critique of the legal profession’s role in maintaining corporate power]

16. Schlosser, E. (2001). Fast Food Nation: The Dark Side of the All-American Meal. Houghton Mifflin Harcourt.

17. Stiglitz, J. E. (2012). The Price of Inequality: How Today’s Divided Society Endangers Our Future. W. W. Norton & Company.

18. Transparency International. (2022). Annual Report and List of Donors. https://www.transparency.org/en/press/transparency-international-annual-...

19. United Nations Conference on Trade and Development (UNCTAD). (2022). Corporate Capture of the Global Agenda. UNCTAD Policy Brief.

20. Zuboff, S. (2019). The Age of Surveillance Capitalism: The Fight for a Human Future at the New Frontier of Power. PublicAffairs.

TYRE NICHOLS’S DEATH RAISES HARD QUESTIONS ABOUT RACE AND POLICING - By Gerard Baker
One understandable but inadequate take on the killing of Tyre Nichols is the idea that we should feel some satisfaction that justice works. Five police officers beat a young black man to a pulp, rendering him lifeless on the street and he dies three days later. The men are all quickly fired, arrested and charged with murder. Thus, the panglossian says, the majesty of the law at work. Awful as it was, there is no larger lesson here beyond man’s unending capacity for inhumanity to man. A terrible crime is committed, quickly investigated and resolved, and the wheels of justice are swiftly set in motion.

Message for New Jersey Gun Owners
New Jersey is a good example of how bad things can truly become for firearm owners. On a scale of 0 to 10 (0 = total prohibition; 10 = to total freedom) New Jersey scores a zero (0). As you might expect, in some cases, Gov. Phil Murphy has made matters worse for lawful gun owners.
References:
[1] Firearm Laws in New Jersey. Excerpt from 2022 Traveler's Guide to the Firearm Laws of the Fifty States.
[2] Sportsman’s Warehouse. How to Legally Drive Firearms Across State Lines, 2021. (YouTube)
[3] “Firearm Owners Protection Act.” In Wikipedia, January 19, 2022.

CLIMATE CHANGE, 5G & THE INTERNET OF THINGS
“The digital transition as it is currently implemented participates to global warming more than it helps preventing it. The need for action is therefore urgent.” - The Shift Project Report on the Environmental Impact of Information and Communication Technologies, 2019 <Click here>

FCC AND BIG TELECOM MAKE US "THE DUMMIES"
Big Tech and its Federal Communications Commission (FCC) toadies have used a fraudulent test to license cell phones, wireless technology and now 5G to push a technology that causes catastrophic biological damage. <Click here>

NEW JERSEY RANKS LAST IN TRANSPARENCY AND OPEN GOVERNMENT
According to a 2016 US News and World Report study, New Jersey RANKS LAST in Transparency and Open Government.  <Click here>

A MESSAGE TO POLICE
The point of this article isn't to judge whether cops are justified in doing what they do. This article has nothing to do with police training. And this isn't just about American cops. This is about the perception that we, the public, have of you when you perform the following actions. It doesn't matter if you disagree with these perceptions, because right or wrong, they exist. The point of this article is to simply let you know that we're watching, and this is how we see things. <Click here>

HOW SOME COPS USE THE BADGE TO COMMIT SEX CRIMES
Research on "police sexual misconduct" — a term used to describe actions from sexual harassment and extortion to forcible rape by officers — overwhelmingly concludes that it is a systemic problem. A 2015 investigation by the Buffalo News, based on a national review of media reports and court records over a 10-year period, concluded that an officer is accused of an act of sexual misconduct at least every five days. The vast majority of incidents, the report found, involve motorists, young people in job-shadowing programs, students, victims of violence and informants. In more than 60 percent of the cases reviewed, an officer was convicted of a crime or faced other consequences.<Click here>

Book Review of The Soprano State: New Jersey's Culture of Corruption
“New Jersey is arguably America’s most corrupt state, and it is not an achievement  to be proud of, as Bob Ingle and Sandy McClure starkly demonstrate. Only the people  of the Garden State can stop the jokes—both the ones elected into office and the  ones told about the crooked truth of political life there.”  —Dr. Larry J. Sabato, author of A More Perfect Constitution and director of the Center for Politics, University of Virginia.
The Soprano State details the you-couldn’t-make-this-up true story of the corruption that has pervaded  New Jersey politics, government, and business for the past thirty years. From Jimmy  Hoffa purportedly being buried somewhere  beneath the end zone in Giants Stadium in  the Meadowlands, through allegations of a  thoroughly corrupt medical and dental university, through Mafia influence at all levels,  to a governor who suddenly declares himself  a “gay American” and resigns, the Garden State might indeed be better named after the HBO mobsters.
Where else would:
• A state attorney general show up after  police pulled over her boyfriend, who was  driving without a valid license?
• A state senator and mayor of Newark (the  same guy) spend thousands of dollars of  taxpayers’ money on a junket to Rio days  before leaving office?
• A politically connected developer hire a prostitute to tape sex acts with his own brother-in-law and then send the tape to his sister?
- Only in the Soprano State

THE POLITICS OF FATHERHOOD - By Stephen Baskerville, Howard University
Perhaps most startling is that by some accounts <New Jersey Family Courts> claim to be exempt from the U.S. Constitution. Family courts describe themselves as courts of "equity" or "chancery" rather than "law," implying they are not necessarily bound by due process, and the rules of evidence are not as stringent as in criminal courts. As one father reports being told by the chief investigator for the administrator of the courts in New Jersey, investigating a complaint in 1998: "The provisions of the U.S. Constitution do not apply in domestic relations cases since they are determined in a court of equity rather than court of law." A connected rule, known as the "domestic relations exception," prevents federal courts exercising constitutional review over family law cases.<Click here>

N.J. JUDGES TOLD TO IGNORE RIGHTS IN ABUSE TRO'S, New Jersey Law Journal 140 (24 April).
Since the Legislature has made domestic violence a top priority, municipal court judges are instructed that they can do their part by issuing temporary restraining orders pronto.
"Throw him out on the street," said trainer and municipal court judge Richard Russell at a similar seminar a year ago, 'give him the clothes on his back, and tell him, 'See ya' around.'"
This napalm approach to implementing the domestic violence statute has some state judges talking. No one disputes the presumption in the law of granting a TRO, and there have been no serious court challenges to the statute's ex parte provisions. <Click here>

BAY AREA CITY BLOCKS 5G DEPLOYMENTS OVER CANCER CONCERNS
The city council of Mill Valley, a small town located just a few miles north of San Francisco, voted unanimously late last week to effectively block deployments of small-cell 5G wireless towers in the city’s residential areas.<Click here>

CONGRESS TO CONSIDER BILL REQUIRING POLICE TO REPORT THEIR MISCONDUCT SETTLEMENTS
Last year, officials in Prince George’s County paid $20 million to the family of a handcuffed man who was killed by a police officer. In Washington, city officials paid out $40 million to victims of police abuse between 2016 and 2020. Chicago paid more than $709 million to police victims in a recent eight-year period. Taxpayers absorb the costs of those payouts annually. But the settlements and judgments are reported sporadically, hiding the effect on city and county services that are often raided to pay the costs of police misconduct, and the long-term debt it creates. So two members of Congress from Virginia, Sen. Tim Kaine (D) and Rep. Don Beyer (D), have introduced a bill that would require law enforcement agencies to report all police-related judgments and settlements, including financial costs and court fees, to a central database maintained by the Justice Department.<Click here>

HOW TO READ THE OPINION OF A COURT
What is an Opinion? When a judge hears a case and arrives at a judgment, an explanation or analysis of the reasoning behind the decision is frequently written. The analysis, called an opinion, is then published in the “Reporter” for the court. Significant decisions are published also in other Reporters. <Click here>

INCOME INEQUALITY IN NEW JERSEY: THE GROWING DIVIDE AND ITS CONSEQUENCES
In the aftermath of national reaction to police actions in Ferguson, New York City, Cleveland, and other municipalities across the country, many seek to understand what led us here. Distinct from the particulars of specific police encounters, the outcries express a widely shared sense of injustice and inequity, in a word unfairness. Income and wealth inequality can serve as fairness indicators in the minds of those without resources. This sense of fairness constitutes the core of why most Americans—and New Jerseyans— believe that inequality matters.
The report examines the current state of income inequality in New Jersey, using the most recent available Census data. It finds that income inequality has continued to increase even after the 2007-2009 recession. Mirroring much highlighted national trends,1 New Jersey income inequality has worsened markedly since the advent of the new millennium.<Click here>